{"id":224,"date":"2026-04-02T14:56:31","date_gmt":"2026-04-02T14:56:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.24hoursvape.com\/?post_type=product&p=224"},"modified":"2026-09-12T18:46:53","modified_gmt":"2026-09-12T18:46:53","slug":"bang-legend-5-in-1-120000-puffs","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/24hoursvape.es\/es\/product\/bang-legend-5-in-1-120000-puffs\/","title":{"rendered":"Bang Legend 5-in-1 120000 Puffs"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Fifteen months with five-tank devices, and what this page settles<\/h2>\n

I have kept a running tally of every multi-tank device that has come through the shop since the middle of 2025, and the Bang Legend 5-in-1 120000 Puffs is the fifth one I have carried long enough to know properly. Fifteen months of selling, refilling, charging and arguing with suppliers about them has taught me that the headline on the box is the least useful number on it, and that the number a buyer actually needs is the one nobody prints: how much liquid sits in one tank.<\/p>\n

So this page is built around that. It states what our own listing for this device says, shows it beside what several other listings for the same model claim, works the liquid out per tank and in total, and gives you a draw estimate derived from the 40 ml rather than from the 120,000 figure. It also names the two things about this product I could not confirm, instead of quietly filling the space with a number from somewhere else. If you want the short version, read the specification section; if you want to know whether it will last you a month, read the section on the arithmetic near the end.<\/p>\n

What this listing states, and what other listings claim<\/h2>\n

The Bang Legend 120K is sold under one model name and described with at least three different specification sets online. The table below separates what our own listing for this device states from what a set of other shops currently claim for the same model, so you can see the disagreement for yourself before you decide which page to trust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
What is being compared<\/th>\nWhat our listing states<\/th>\nWhat several other listings claim<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Liquid in the device<\/td>\n40 ml total, 8 ml per tank<\/td>\nMost say 50 ml; one says 40 ml<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bater\u00eda<\/td>\n18350 cell, 850 mAh<\/td>\nEither 850 mAh, 650 mAh or 600 mAh, and two of them state two different figures on one page<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bobina<\/td>\n1.0 ohm mesh, five individual coils<\/td>\nAgreed: 1.0 ohm mesh, five coils<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tanks<\/td>\nFive, selected by a dial<\/td>\nAgreed: five, with a rotating selector<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cargando<\/td>\nPuerto r\u00e1pido tipo C<\/td>\nAgreed: Type-C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strength of the liquid<\/td>\nNot stated on our specification sheet, and the strength option on our own listing is not populated. Confirm before ordering<\/td>\nThey list four levels, 0 per cent, 2 per cent, 3 per cent and 5 per cent<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Box contents<\/td>\nNot stated on our specification sheet. Confirm before ordering<\/td>\nOne device, according to one of them<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Two of those rows are gaps on our side, not claims, and I am leaving them as gaps. A specification I cannot read off our own listing is not something I will copy from a competitor’s page, because the two of us are describing different production batches until somebody proves otherwise.<\/p>\n

The five-tank frame: 8 ml per tank, one coil per tank<\/h2>\n

Five tanks and five coils is the whole design, so it makes sense to look at one tank at a time rather than at the device as a single 40 ml block. Each tank holds 8 ml and is served by its own 1.0 ohm mesh coil, and turning the dial at the base moves you from one to the next.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Tank<\/th>\nLiquid in that tank<\/th>\nCoil serving it<\/th>\nWhat that tank gives you<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
One<\/td>\n8 ml<\/td>\n1.0 ohm mesh<\/td>\nA self-contained unit: its own liquid, its own wick, its own heat<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Two<\/td>\n8 ml<\/td>\n1.0 ohm mesh<\/td>\nA fresh coil when you switch, because the previous one stops firing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Three<\/td>\n8 ml<\/td>\n1.0 ohm mesh<\/td>\n8 ml of one taste, not a blend of everything in the device<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Four<\/td>\n8 ml<\/td>\n1.0 ohm mesh<\/td>\nA share of the load, so no single coil carries the whole 40 ml<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Five<\/td>\n8 ml<\/td>\n1.0 ohm mesh<\/td>\nThe last tank is a spare in practice: you can leave one unopened<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Whole device<\/td>\n40 ml<\/td>\nFive coils<\/td>\nFive separate tastes, carried in one frame instead of five devices<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Why five small chambers beat one big one<\/h3>\n

That last row is the honest reason the five-tank format exists. You are not buying 40 ml of one flavour; you are buying five 8 ml portions that happen not to share a wick, and the moment you accept that, the draw estimate further down this page stops looking pessimistic and starts looking like ordinary arithmetic.<\/p>\n

The full specification, and what each figure changes for you<\/h2>\n

Every figure below is the one our listing for this device carries. The third column is the part most specification sheets leave out, which is what the number does to your day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Stated figure<\/th>\nWhere it comes from in the device<\/th>\nWhat it changes for you<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Hasta 120,000 puffs en total<\/td>\nThe manufacturer’s rated maximum for the whole device<\/td>\nA rating, not a forecast. Read it with the section on the arithmetic before you plan around it<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40 ml of liquid<\/td>\nFive tanks of 8 ml each, pre-filled and sealed<\/td>\nNothing to pour, nothing to top up. It is the liquid that sets how long the device lasts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1.0 ohm mesh coil, five of them<\/td>\nOne coil per tank, each in its own chamber<\/td>\nA mesh coil heats quickly, so the taste arrives on the first draw rather than the third<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18350 cell, 850 mAh<\/td>\nA single replaceable-format cylindrical cell inside the frame<\/td>\nYou will recharge this device several times before the liquid runs out, not once<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Puerto r\u00e1pido tipo C<\/td>\nOn the base of the frame, next to the dial<\/td>\nAny modern phone cable works, so a top-up is a few minutes rather than a planned event<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dial de cambio de sabor 5 en 1<\/td>\nA rotating selector on the base that indexes to one tank at a time<\/td>\nChanging taste takes a second and needs no tools and no spare pods<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Screen showing battery and liquid level<\/td>\nA display set into the side of the frame<\/td>\nYou can see a tank running low before it tastes dry, which is the difference between a clean switch and a burnt one<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

One number is deliberately absent from that table: the strength of the liquid. Our own specification sheet does not state it and, as noted above, the strength field on our own product listing is configured but carries no value, so there is nothing for me to print. I am not going to borrow a figure from a shop that is describing a different batch.<\/p>\n

The twelve labelled sets, and the one that is missing<\/h2>\n

Our listing carries twelve numbered sets of five flavours. Be aware of two things about that list before you order. Its ninth entry appears on the specification sheet but is not among the twelve options our listing lets you select, and its seventh entry appears twice in that option list. If the set you want is set nine, ask us first rather than assuming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Conjunto<\/th>\nThe five flavours in it<\/th>\nTaste direction<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nEnergy drink, blueberry cherry, apple grape, watermelon pitaya, mamba<\/td>\nFizzy and sweet, with a cool mint finish<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nEnergy drink, peach ice, mango ice, cranberry grape, blackcurrant<\/td>\nCold fruit from end to end, the chilliest set here<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nBlueberry raspberry, peach mango watermelon, cherry cola, grape blackberry ice, mango peach apricot<\/td>\nA cola tank in the middle of four soft fruit tanks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nBlueberry raspberry, black dragon ice, rainbow candy, fuji ice, watermelon sour peach<\/td>\nSour peach against candy, the sharpest of the twelve<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nBlueberry ice, kiwi passion fruit guava, triple melon, peach pineapple, passionate kiss<\/td>\nTropical throughout, with one cold tank at the start<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nBlueberry ice, watermelon bubble gum, sour apple raspberry, asparagus mango melon, passion fruit kiwi lime<\/td>\nThe odd one out: bubble gum next to sour lime and melon<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nWatermelon ice, mixed berry, apple pear, blueberry mint, summer time<\/td>\nClean and light, the easiest set to use all day<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nWatermelon ice, strawberry mango, california cherry, blueberry peach ice, berry ice<\/td>\nCherry and berry led, with softer fruit behind them<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nStrawberry watermelon, grape ice, red mojito, banana ice, lemon lime<\/td>\nMojito and citrus, the most savoury-adjacent set. Listed on our sheet but not selectable in our option list<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nStrawberry watermelon, cantaloupe apple, cola ice, mango peach, love 66<\/td>\nCool melon and cola with ripe stone fruit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nStrawberry kiwi, strawberry banana, lychee ice, watermelon berry, passion fruit mango<\/td>\nCreamy and floral, the softest of the twelve<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nStrawberry kiwi, blueberry watermelon, gummy bear, blueberry bubble gum, sour mango pineapple<\/td>\nCandy shop, with sour pineapple as the last tank<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The two entries that matter most in that list<\/h3>\n

The names in that table are ours. Four of the twelve sets are spelled differently on other listings for this model, including one that calls a flavour bear fudge where our sheet says gummy bear, and one that names a fruit our sheet does not. Those are listing differences on the same model number, and I have no way to tell from here which spelling matches a given production batch.<\/p>\n

Using it: the dial, the display, the first fill<\/h2>\n

Selecting a tank without guessing<\/h3>\n

Turn the dial on the base slowly until it seats. Our listing describes a click as it indexes into position, and that click is the whole instruction: if you stop between two detents the airflow is shared and the taste you get is a blend of the two tanks on either side. Take the first draw after a switch as a throwaway. It clears the small amount of vapour still sitting in the shared mouthpiece, and the tank you selected reads properly from the second draw onwards.<\/p>\n

What the display is actually telling you<\/h3>\n

The screen reports battery level and the liquid level of the tank you are on. Treat the liquid figure as the more useful of the two, because it is the one that stops a dry draw: switch away from a tank that is nearly empty rather than trying to finish it, and the wick in that tank stays intact for whenever you come back to it. The battery figure matters mainly because output sags near the end of a charge, so a tank that tastes thin on a low battery usually tastes right again after ten minutes on a cable.<\/p>\n

Charging it properly the first time<\/h3>\n

There is nothing to prime and nothing to fill. Stand the device upright for five minutes after unboxing so any liquid that moved in transit settles back over the wicks, then charge it to full before the first session. Our own notes from testing put a full charge at about fifteen to thirty minutes on a Type-C cable, which is quick enough that the habit worth forming is a short top-up rather than an overnight session.<\/p>\n

Looking after it: charges, coils, and what a fault costs<\/h2>\n

An 850 mAh cell behind 40 ml of liquid is not a one-charge device, and this is the part of owning a five-tank model that catches people out. The cell is a compact 18350 format, generally rated between 700 and 1,200 mAh depending on the batch, and 850 mAh works out at roughly 3.15 watt hours. That is a few hours of ordinary intermittent use per charge, not a week of it, so plan on recharging this device repeatedly across the life of one fill.<\/p>\n

The one fault that matters on this design<\/h3>\n

Because all five tanks share a single selector and a single frame, a selector that stops indexing takes the other four tanks with it. That does not make the device fragile, but it does mean the dial is the part to handle gently and the part to mention first if you ever need to raise a fault with us. The 18350 format is also standardised, which is the reason a device this size can be specified with a cell in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Do this<\/th>\nWhat it prevents<\/th>\nWhat it costs you if you skip it<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Seat the dial fully before drawing<\/td>\nTwo tanks feeding one draw, so a taste neither of them has<\/td>\nA tank you write off as disappointing when the fault was the selector position<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Move off a tank before it is empty<\/td>\nThe wick in that tank running dry and scorching<\/td>\nThat tank’s 8 ml tastes burnt from then on, and there is no way to re-wick it<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Top up the charge rather than draining it<\/td>\nThin output at the end of a charge and unnecessary deep cycles<\/td>\nCells of this class are usually good for a few hundred full cycles, and deep discharges spend them faster<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Leave the device standing between sessions<\/td>\nLiquid pooling on one side of a chamber<\/td>\nA gurgling first draw and a small amount of liquid in the mouthpiece<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Keep it out of a hot car<\/td>\nHeat thinning the liquid inside sealed chambers<\/td>\nSeepage past the seals, which is the one problem on a sealed device that cannot be fixed at home<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Expect a change in taste as a tank empties<\/td>\nMistaking normal wick ageing for a faulty coil<\/td>\nNothing, if you expect it. Industry guidance puts a mesh coil of this type at roughly 5 to 10 ml of liquid before the taste fades, and one tank is 8 ml, so a tank is a coil’s normal working life<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

That last row is the concession I would want a shop to make to me. Five coils spread the load, but they do not make each coil immortal, and a tank is about the amount of liquid one mesh coil handles before the taste goes flat. Anyone promising you otherwise is selling you the box, not the device.<\/p>\n

Which of the twelve sets suits which taste<\/h2>\n

Every listing for this device prints the twelve combinations, so printing them again would tell you nothing. What is missing from all of them is a recommendation, so here is mine, grouped by what you actually reach for.<\/p>\n