{"id":240,"date":"2026-04-03T15:25:49","date_gmt":"2026-04-03T15:25:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.24hoursvape.com\/?post_type=product&p=240"},"modified":"2026-09-12T18:46:53","modified_gmt":"2026-09-12T18:46:53","slug":"uzy-triple-flavours-60k-puffs","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/24hoursvape.es\/es\/product\/uzy-triple-flavours-60k-puffs\/","title":{"rendered":"UZY Triple Flavours 60K Puffs"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Four weeks with three tanks instead of one<\/h2>\n

What a fortnight of switching actually felt like<\/h3>\n

I have carried this one around for four weeks, and the thing that changes your habits is not the puff figure on the box. It is that the mouthpiece has three separate 18 ml tanks under it and a selector between them, so the device you pick up in the morning is not the same flavour you finish in the evening. I ran mine in Pro mode for most of the first fortnight and switched to Max for a weekend to see what that does to consumption.<\/p>\n

What this page covers, and what it will not fake<\/h3>\n

This page covers the three-tank arithmetic that no listing bothers to spell out, the full specification as 24HoursVape<\/strong> records it, what the 60,000 figure is actually worth in draws, the ten flavour trios, and the four things about the tanks that no source I could reach states at all — including the coil resistance, which our own listing does not give and which I will not borrow from a competitor.<\/p>\n

Three tanks, one device: the arithmetic<\/h2>\n

Why the total is written as three equal numbers<\/h3>\n

Our listing states the fill in its own words: Real 54 ml (18 ml + 18 ml + 18 ml)<\/em>. That is not a marketing total with a per-tank figure hidden behind it — it is three equal chambers, and the sum is the headline. Read it as three devices sharing one battery and one screen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Tank<\/th>\nAs our listing states it<\/th>\nWhat it adds up to<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Tank one<\/strong><\/td>\n18 ml<\/td>\nOne third of the fill, one flavour, selected on its own<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tank two<\/strong><\/td>\n18 ml<\/td>\nSecond third, second flavour<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tank three<\/strong><\/td>\n18 ml<\/td>\nThird third, third flavour<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Device total<\/strong><\/td>\n54 ml<\/td>\n18 + 18 + 18 = 54, and 54 ÷ 3 = 18 ml per tank<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

That arithmetic is the whole reason the device is worth a second look, and it is also why a single daily-consumption figure is meaningless here. If you empty one tank in a week, the other two are untouched; the device is not finished, it has simply changed what is left in it.<\/p>\n

What our listing does not state about the tanks<\/h2>\n

Four questions I could not answer from any source<\/h3>\n

These four questions decide whether a three-tank device suits you, and I could not find a single source — ours included — that answers any of them. I am publishing them as open rather than filling them with a sensible guess, because a wrong answer here is what produces a return.<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Which flavour sits in which tank.<\/strong> The flavour options are sold as fixed trios, and our variation data records the trio as one option, not three positions. Nothing states whether the first-named flavour is in tank one or in the tank furthest from the mouthpiece.<\/li>\n
  • What a part-used tank does.<\/strong> If one tank runs dry while the other two still hold liquid, nothing states whether the device refuses that position, warns you on the screen, or simply gives a weak draw until you move the selector.<\/li>\n
  • Whether the three can be drawn together.<\/strong> The selector is described as a way to change flavour, not as a blend control. Nothing states that two or three tanks can feed one draw.<\/li>\n
  • Whether the tanks can be refilled.<\/strong> Our listing calls the fill pre-filled and gives no refill port, and I will not describe it as refillable on the strength of a slug or a competitor’s wording. Treat the 54 ml as the whole usable fill.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    One thing is worth separating from those gaps. Every listing and every retailer page I checked describes the tanks as separate and switchable rather than blended, and each chamber is described as carrying its own coil, so cross-contamination between the three flavours should not happen — but that is a sensible reading of a separate-tank design, not a figure our listing prints, and I am calling it out as an inference rather than a fact.<\/p>\n

    Full specification<\/h2>\n

    Everything below is what 24HoursVape<\/strong> records for this listing. Where the shop records nothing, the row is absent rather than filled from someone else’s page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Especificaci\u00f3n<\/th>\nValue as recorded<\/th>\nWhat it changes for you<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Cuenta de caladas<\/strong><\/td>\nUp to 60,000 (60K)<\/td>\nA manufacturer rating, not a measured figure — see the draw estimate below<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Flavour format<\/strong><\/td>\n3-in-1, three selectable flavours<\/td>\nThe reason to buy this model over a single-flavour 60K<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Fill volume<\/strong><\/td>\nReal 54 ml (18 ml + 18 ml + 18 ml)<\/td>\nThree tanks, so one dry chamber leaves two usable ones<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Nicotine strengths<\/strong><\/td>\n2 % \/ 5 %<\/td>\nTwo options only; there is no nicotine-free variant on this listing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Bater\u00eda<\/strong><\/td>\n850 mAh, rechargeable<\/td>\nSized for a device that expects to be charged, not thrown away at first flat<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Bobina<\/strong><\/td>\nDual mesh coil<\/td>\nEven heating; the coil resistance is not stated anywhere on our listing<\/strong> and is deliberately not published here<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Cargando<\/strong><\/td>\npuerto Type-C<\/td>\nAny standard cable works; the device is a rechargeable, not a sealed unit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Pantalla<\/strong><\/td>\npantalla inteligente LED<\/td>\nShows battery and liquid level, which matters more with three chambers to track<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Power modes<\/strong><\/td>\nPro and Max<\/td>\nPro stretches the fill, Max spends it faster for a warmer draw<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Peso<\/strong><\/td>\nApprox. 120 g per piece<\/td>\nNoticeably heavier in a pocket than a small bar — it is a 54 ml device<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Pack format<\/strong><\/td>\n10 pieces per box, 200 per carton<\/td>\nBoxes are single-flavour by default, so a mixed order is a carton decision<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Peso del cart\u00f3n<\/strong><\/td>\nApprox. 24 kg gross<\/td>\nHandling figure, not a per-device figure<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    Coil resistance:<\/strong> the manufacturer’s rating is not determined<\/strong> in our own product data. Our listing names the coil type and stops there, so there is no resistance row above. Several competitor listings print a figure; they do not agree with each other, and none of them is our listing, so none of them belongs on this page.<\/p>\n

    Estimate it yourself: 54 ml of e-liquid is the number that means something<\/h2>\n

    How this estimate was built, and why not from the headline<\/h3>\n

    The 60,000 rating tells you the class of device. The fill tells you what you will actually vape.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Figure<\/th>\nValue<\/th>\nHow to read it<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    What our listing claims<\/strong><\/td>\n60,000 draws from 54 ml<\/td>\nEquals 1,111 draws per millilitre; that is arithmetic on the claim, not a measurement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Ordinary mouth-to-lung consumption<\/strong><\/td>\n200 to 300 draws per millilitre<\/td>\n1,800 to 2,700 draws per 18 ml tank; 5,400 to 8,100 across the three tanks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Open, high-output draw<\/strong><\/td>\n65 to 150 draws per millilitre<\/td>\nWith the coil resistance unstated, I cannot say which style this device is aimed at, so both bands stay on the table<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Nearest hard comparison available<\/strong><\/td>\n1,200 draws measured against 2,100 claimed<\/td>\nA different brand’s device, bench-tested and reported at roughly 57 % of its rating — a finding that does not transfer to this device’s numbers, only the caution does<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    So the honest planning figure is not a percentage of 60,000. It is your own 54 ml multiplied by your own draw length. Long, slow draws and Max mode both move you towards the bottom of the range; short mouth-to-lung draws in Pro mode move you towards the top.<\/p>\n

    Ten flavour trios — and where the listings disagree about them<\/h2>\n

    The trios as our listing records them<\/h3>\n

    Our listing carries ten trios. I record the flavour names exactly as the shop lists them, including every word in brackets and every spelling of ice<\/em>:<\/p>\n