{"id":3161,"date":"2026-05-10T17:12:36","date_gmt":"2026-05-10T17:12:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/24hoursvape.com\/?post_type=product&p=3161"},"modified":"2026-09-12T18:26:47","modified_gmt":"2026-09-12T18:26:47","slug":"vopk-triple-flavour-60k-puffs","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/24hoursvape.es\/es\/product\/vopk-triple-flavour-60k-puffs\/","title":{"rendered":"VOPK Triple Flavour 60K Puffs"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

I carried this one for six weeks<\/h2>\n

Six weeks is long enough to stop noticing a new device in a jacket pocket, and this one never quite managed it. The reason is the top section. The VOPK Triple Flavour 60K puffs is a three-tank disposable: 54 ml of liquid split into three 18 ml reservoirs, a 0.9 ohm mesh coil sitting inside each one, a 650 mAh rechargeable cell and a Type-C port. You pull the top up, turn it, and the mouthpiece lines up with one tank at a time, so you are never drawing through a coil that has been soaking in a different profile.<\/p>\n

This page records what our own listing states for the VOPK Triple Flavour 60K puffs, works out what 54 ml actually covers once you are drawing it, sets out where other pages for this model print something different, and finishes with the practical decisions – which of the ten flavour sets to take, how to look after three tanks at once, and whether this is the right VOPK for the way you draw.<\/p>\n

How the pull-and-rotate selector moves between tanks<\/h2>\n

The mechanism is the whole point of this device, and our listing compresses it into three words: pull-and-rotate switch. In the hand it is a little more specific than that. There is no side slider and no menu to scroll. The top section is<\/em> the selector, and the tank you are drawing from is decided entirely by where it is pointing.<\/p>\n

Turning the top section to a new tank<\/h3>\n

You lift the top section a few millimetres, turn it to the tank you want, and let it drop back so it seats with a click. The mouthpiece travels with it, which means the opening lines up with the tank you selected and with nothing else. That is what keeps the three profiles apart. You are not blending three liquids through one airway, you are choosing one of three and drawing from that one alone.<\/p>\n

One coil per tank, not one shared coil<\/h3>\n

Each of the three tanks has its own 0.9 ohm mesh coil inside it, so turning the selector changes the coil at the same moment it changes the liquid. In practice that is why a sharp fruit does not pick up mint from the tank you were using ten minutes earlier – the two never meet. Our listing records the arrangement simply as 0.9 ohm x 3 mesh coils, and the shop’s own text describes that 0.9 ohm figure as suited to a mouth-to-lung draw.<\/p>\n

Reading the three oil bars on the screen<\/h3>\n

The display carries two things worth watching. One is the cell. The other is the liquid, shown as three separate oil levels rather than one combined figure. On this device that distinction does real work: because each tank empties at its own rate, a single bar would tell you almost nothing, while three bars tell you which tank is closest to done. That is the one thing you need to know before you rotate to it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Move on the selector<\/th>\nWhat you do with your hand<\/th>\nWhat the device confirms back<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Lift<\/td>\nPull the top section up a few millimetres<\/td>\nThe section clears its seat and turns freely<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Turn<\/td>\nRotate it until it faces the tank you want<\/td>\nThe mouthpiece swings round to line up with that tank<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Seat<\/td>\nLet it drop back into place<\/td>\nA click, as the new tank locks home<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Draw<\/td>\nUse it exactly as before<\/td>\nOnly the selected tank and its own coil sit in the airway<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Check<\/td>\nGlance at the display before a long session<\/td>\nThree oil bars, so you can see which tank is lowest<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The figures, as our listing states them<\/h2>\n

Everything in the table below comes from our own listing for this device. Where a number is the manufacturer’s published figure rather than something we measured, the table says so, and nothing here has been filled in from another site’s page.<\/p>\n

What each row is based on<\/h3>\n

The 60,000 puff figure and the 54 ml capacity are VOPK’s published claims for this model, recorded on our listing as manufacturer figures. The 650 mAh cell, the Type-C port and the 0.9 ohm mesh coils are the same kind of figure – the maker’s, carried on our sheet. The strength of 2 per cent is not a claim but a setting: every one of the ten flavour variations on this listing carries it, and the selector attached to this row offers no other value. If you are comparing the VOPK range here, the VOPK brand page<\/a> collects all three devices in one place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Item on this listing<\/th>\nThe figure as written<\/th>\nWhat it changes once it is in your hand<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Marca<\/td>\nVOPK<\/td>\nOne of three VOPK devices here; this is the three-tank one<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cuenta de caladas<\/td>\nUp to 60,000 puffs, manufacturer’s figure<\/td>\nThe headline number, and the one the section below tests against the liquid<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Liquid<\/td>\n54 ml, held as three tanks of 18 ml<\/td>\nThree separate profiles instead of one, and 18 ml behind each of them<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bobina<\/td>\n0.9 ohm mesh, one per tank<\/td>\nChanging tank changes the coil too, so profiles cannot bleed into each other<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bater\u00eda<\/td>\n650 mAh, rechargeable<\/td>\nNot something you discard when the cell flattens; it takes a charge<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cargando<\/td>\nType-C, about forty minutes to full on our listing<\/td>\nA standard lead, and a charge short enough to fit into a lunch break<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fuerza<\/td>\n2 per cent, the only value this row carries<\/td>\nNo choice to make, and no chance of ordering the wrong one<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pantalla<\/td>\nOil and battery display, three tank levels visible<\/td>\nYou can see which tank is lowest before you commit to it<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Body finish<\/td>\nVacuum plating, baking paint and UV printing<\/td>\nA smooth coated shell with printed graphics rather than a bare moulding<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Flavour sets<\/td>\nTen triple-flavour options<\/td>\nTen fixed trios to choose between, rather than a build-your-own<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Where other pages for this model disagree<\/h2>\n

Several other shops list this same device, and they do not agree with one another. That disagreement is worth publishing rather than smoothing over, because a buyer comparing two tabs will meet it anyway. None of it is resolved here by copying one of them.<\/p>\n

The strength figure, and why ours reads differently<\/h3>\n

This is the row that moves most. Our own listing carries 2 per cent on every variation, and it is the only value the selector offers. Pages elsewhere for the same model print single figures of 2 per cent or of 5 per cent, one page offers 0, 2, 3 and 5 per cent as choices, and another prints 5 per cent on its own. A strength is not something a page can average out, so this page publishes the one our listing actually sells and leaves the others where they are printed.<\/p>\n

The coil claim that other pages make<\/h3>\n

A second disagreement is quieter and easier to miss. Some pages describe the three mesh coils as working together for a denser draw, which implies that all three fire at once. Our listing describes the opposite arrangement: one coil inside each tank, brought into the airway when you rotate to that tank. On a device with three separate reservoirs the two readings cannot both be true, and the arrangement in our own text is the one that explains why the profiles stay apart.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Point on this model<\/th>\nWhat this listing records<\/th>\nWhat several other pages print<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Fuerza<\/td>\n2 per cent, on every variation<\/td>\nSingle figures of 2 or 5 per cent; one page offers 0, 2, 3 and 5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Coil arrangement<\/td>\nOne 0.9 ohm mesh coil inside each tank<\/td>\nThree coils described as firing together<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Liquid breakdown<\/td>\n54 ml shown as three tanks of 18 ml<\/td>\nA single 54 ml figure with no tank split<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tank selection<\/td>\nPull-and-rotate switch, with the mouthpiece following the tank<\/td>\nThe phrase three-in-one, with no description of how you switch<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rated puffs<\/td>\nUp to 60,000, labelled as the manufacturer’s figure<\/td>\nThe same 60,000, usually stated without qualification<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Packing data<\/td>\nOur row carries no carton count or carton weight<\/td>\nThe pages we checked do not publish it either<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

What 54 ml covers in practice<\/h2>\n

Sixty thousand is VOPK’s rating for this model, and it belongs on the page. What it does not do is tell you how long the device will last you, because a puff count is not a measurement of anything you can hold in your hand. The figure you can actually plan with comes from the liquid, and from how much of that liquid one draw takes.<\/p>\n

The per-tank figure<\/h3>\n

A mouth-to-lung draw through a 0.9 ohm mesh coil usually consumes somewhere between one two-hundredth and one three-hundredth of a millilitre, which gives the 200 to 300 draws per millilitre band used below. Each of the three tanks holds 18 ml, so a single tank supports roughly 3,600 to 5,400 draws. All three together come to between 10,800 and 16,200.<\/p>\n

Why the headline is not a planning number<\/h3>\n

Divide 60,000 by 54 ml and the rating is asking for about 1,111 draws from every single millilitre. That is roughly three to five times the band above, which is a good illustration of why the two numbers should never be treated as the same kind of claim. For context rather than as a figure to carry across: an independent bench test on a different device in this puff-count class measured 1,200 draws where 2,100 had been claimed, which is a per-millilitre finding about that device and not a percentage that transfers to this one. The band in the table is therefore built from the 54 ml this device holds, tank by tank, and it is a planning figure rather than a promise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Tank<\/th>\nLiquid it holds<\/th>\nDraws at 200 per ml<\/th>\nDraws at 300 per ml<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Tank one<\/td>\n18 ml<\/td>\n3,600<\/td>\n5,400<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tank two<\/td>\n18 ml<\/td>\n3,600<\/td>\n5,400<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tank three<\/td>\n18 ml<\/td>\n3,600<\/td>\n5,400<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
All three tanks<\/td>\n54 ml<\/td>\n10,800<\/td>\n16,200<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Choosing between the ten flavour sets<\/h2>\n

The ten options are fixed trios rather than a pick-and-mix. You choose a set, and the three profiles inside that set are the three tanks. Grouping them by direction is more useful than listing them in catalogue order, because most people already know which direction they want before they read a single name.<\/p>\n

The ten sets, grouped by direction<\/h3>\n

Four directions cover all ten. The ice-led sets lead with a chilled fruit and keep the cooling in at least two of the three tanks. The tropical sets are the soft and juicy end, with coconut, passion fruit and mango doing the work. The berry and citrus sets sit closest to a plain fruit profile, and the candy and dessert sets are the sweet end, where a vanilla or a cola turns up alongside the fruit.<\/p>\n